Free Consultations & We're Available 24/7

Call for a free consultation

212-300-5196

Spodek Law Group

✓Concierge Service. A+ Results.
✓Over 40 Years of Experience
✓Available 24/7
✓We Get Cases Dismissed

Talk To An Attorney

Service Oriented Law Firm

WE'RE A BOUTIQUE NYC CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAW FIRM. YOU WORK WITH ONE OF OUR SENIOR ATTORNEYS PERSONALLY.

Over 50 Years Experience

WE'RE ONE OF NEW YORK'S OLDEST CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAW FIRMS. TRUST 50 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE.

Multiple Offices

WE HAVE OFFICES ALL OVER NYC, AND LONG ISLAND. WE MAKE IT EASY TO MEET AND SPEAK TO AN ATTORNEY.

Nationally recognized nyc criminal lawyers

  • We offer payment plans, unlike other law firms, in order to make it so you can afford our services.
  • 99% of the criminal defense cases we handle end up with a better outcome.
  • We have over 40 years of experience handling criminal defense cases successfully.

99% Of Cases We Handle
End With a Better Outcome

View more case results

NYC Forcible Touching Lawyers

New York’s penal code defines forcible touching as the intentional touching of another person’s sexual or intimate parts for no reason except sexual gratification. Touching covers a variety of different touches including pinching, grabbing, and squeezing. Forcible touching is a sex crime. Unlike the other sex crimes defined in New York’s penal code, forcible touching is not a felony. That said, it is a class A misdemeanor, which is the most serious form of misdemeanor. Conviction can result in a sentence of up to one year in jail.

Convictions also have damaging and lasting consequences as the conviction will be apparent on your criminal record. You will also be placed in the registry of sex offenders. Accusation of forcible touching can affect personal and professional relationships even when the accusation doesn’t result in a conviction. For this reason, it’s important to get in touch with an expert New York attorney as soon as possible. Spodek Law Group is a group of New York City attorneys who have been practicing criminal defense since 1976.

Definition of Forcible Touching

Forcible touching can be colloquially called groping. Oftentimes, this act occurs in public and crowded places like buses, the subway, or bars. One relevant case is the 2002 case People v. Soto, which involved a defendant whose actions occurred in a public and crowded place. The defendant put his fingers onto a woman’s vagina through the fabric of her clothing while the two were on the subway together. Another example is People v. Parbhu, another 2002 case. In this case, the defendant rubbed his penis against the thigh and buttocks of a woman while the two were waiting for the subway.

Forcible touching isn’t required to happen in crowded places. Oftentimes, the crime occurs in private homes. The defendant in these cases tends to be a friend of the family or the victim’s relative. The 2010 case People v. Smileyinvolved a defendant who was the victim’s father. Meanwhile, People v. Powell was a 2008 case in which the defendant was the cousin of the victim. Both of these cases involve incidents which occurred while inside a private home.

Forcible touching is different from sex crimes such as rape or sexual misconduct because it doesn’t need to involve penetration, oral sexual acts, or anal sexual acts. The only relevant qualification is that you have touched another person’s intimate areas without their consent and without a legitimate reason. Skin-to-skin contact isn’t required for the charge to be leveled. People v. Taylor was a 2009 case in which the defendant stood accused of touching a 14-year-old’s vaginal area with his penis through her pants. Other cases have involved the touching of a woman’s vagina through the fabric of her clothes.

Intimate parts include genitalia, buttocks, and breasts. People v. Smiley resulted in the court holding that the charge was sustainable based on the accusation that the defendant had touched the vagina of a 13-year-old girl, grabbed her breasts, and squeezed her buttocks. Most cases involving forcible touching happen when the victim is wearing clothes.

Lack of Consent

The defining characteristic of sex crimes is a lack of consent. There are multiple ways in which lack of consent can be demonstrated, including incapacity to consent, lack of express consent, and forcible compulsion. The prosecutor is not required to prove that physical force was exerted or the victim was threatened in order to prove forcible touching occurred. It’s only required that the victim testify they didn’t consent to the act in any way.

by Leonard on Spodek Law Group
Awesome Lawyers

Spodek Law is a great firm. They are super pragmatic

Request Free Consultation

Videos

Newspaper articles

Recent Case Results

Testimonial

Very diligent, organized associates; got my case dismissed. Hard working divorce attorneys who can put up with your anxiousness. Definitely A law group that lays out all possible options and best alternative routes. Recommended for sure.

- ROBIN, GUN CHARGES ROBIN

Get Free Advice About Your Case

Spodek Law Group

140 Broadway 46th Floor,

New York, NY 10005

Phone

212-300-5196

Fax

212-300-6371

Spodek Law Group

35-37 36th St,
Astoria, NY 11106

Phone

212-300-5196

Fax

212-300-6371

Spodek Law Group

195 Montague St.

Brooklyn, NY 11201

Phone

212-300-5196

Fax

212-300-6371

Follow us on
Call Now